Talk:Common Management Information Service

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

mistake in article name?

Maybe it should be 'Common Management Information Services' instead of 'Common Management Information Service'. I read this in a course book, it might be a mistake. They wrote it (abbreviated) as CMIS/CMIP. I wondered how they prounounce it (I wondered if it was like in TCP/IP = TCP over IP), so I checked this page. If anyone has answers to the questions above, please edit the page. --Bernard François 23:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure). Jenks24 (talk) 18:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Common management information service -> Common Management Information Service

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a proper noun referring to a single international standard, not some general class of common management information services. — Dgtsyb (talk) 22:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Not a proper name, common management information service is just a concept. Stick with the MoS - no need for an exception here. Joja lozzo 02:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is a specific international standard specified in ITU-T Recommendation X.710, ISO/IEC International Standard 9595. As the name of a specific and uniquely defined standard service interface (see X.200 for what a service interface is) it is a proper noun. It is a proper noun, just as Simple Network Management Protocol. — Dgtsyb (talk) 06:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all the capitalization requests by Dgtsyb until he produces evidence for the claims that these are propoer names; none of the ones that I have checked in book are. Dicklyon (talk) 05:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I'm afraid this article is discussing a specific solution, just like its protocol counterpart. It is not a generic discussion on common management information services. Thus, it is a proper noun and should be upper-cased. Nageh (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support This article doesn't describe the generic concept of managing information in common. It's describes a specific standard set by the ITU-T, part of the OSI model. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is the Common Management Information Service. There may be other common management information services, but that's not what the article is about. See also Talk:Intelligent network#Requested move. Andrewa (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support, given what the article is about, it seems to be a proper noun - a specific standard, not a general concept.--Kotniski (talk) 08:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.