Talk:Code page 865

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The character at position 0xAF is ambiguous

According to Code page 865 there is the ¤ (CURRENCY SIGN) at the position 0xAF. The Code page 437 contains a » (RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK) at the position 0xAF.

There are the following links that support that the ¤ (CURRENCY SIGN) is correct: - msdn.microsoft.com - [1] - [2]

If ¤ (CURRENCY SIGN) is at the position 0xAF there would be three characters different compared to Code page 437. Additionally there would be a « but no » .

Can someone who actually used Code page 865 verify this. Raise exception (talk) 13:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This can be easily checked in Windows by changing the code page. On a Dutch Windows the default DOS (OEM) code page is CP850. I can change it to CP437 or CP865. When I change the code page to CP865 and display a text file with all 256 characters, a currency sign is displayed at position 0xaf.

See http://www.xs4all.nl/~waterlan/CP865.png First cp850 is shown (the default) then cp437, and then cp865.

Erwin Waterlander 83.160.52.146 (talk) 21:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the article to show the three differences between this code page and code page 437. —Coroboy (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]