Talk:Ciphertext-only attack

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Computing: Software / Security Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer security (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

In the comment about the poles cracking the enigma cyphertext-only w/ the device settings … the device settings are the key so I don't see how this even qualifies as an attack. 66.188.120.75 (talk) 00:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Enigma was cracked using what is called "known-plaintext attack" or maybe "chosen-plaintext attack". That is, the cryptanalysts at Bletchley Park assumed that some random message began with some known sentence/part of sentence and then they used that to guess the key. In conclusion, Enigma shouldn't even be mentioned here. 69.165.143.15 (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)‎[reply]

؟5،.7!؟5،!3.!7.؟1،.3!?!1..2!!4.!2.?!1..2!!1.؟5،.6!؟1،?.1!؟5،.2!!1.!6. 37.243.98.24 (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]