Talk:Chern–Simons form

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Seed Interview: James Simons". Seed Magazine. September 19, 2006.

Older comments

The definition of F is missing. Bartosz 13:03, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

you say "in 1 dimension", "in 3 dimensions" etc... does that refer to the dimension of the manifold?

Why the word "secondary"? I've seen similar terminology in other (related) contexts. - Gauge 06:49, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the precise definition. Perhaps it implies derived from further structure (connection, flat bundle, foliation ...), rather than a plain bundle. Alarmingly I have just seen a reference to tertiary classes. Charles Matthews 08:37, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Tr[A]=0 in general? If I recall correctly, you can't have a non-trivial gauge theory in 1D anyway.

Tr[A]=0 for SU(N), but you could also have a U(N) gauge theory where the U(1) part gives a non-vanishing trace. In particular for a U(1) gauge theory, Tr[A]=A. But you're right that there are no dynamical degrees of freedom in one dimension (you can just pick a gauge where A=0). You could still have a topological theory, however, where the topological index is the U(1) winding number. 142.3.164.195 21:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mention in Seed

Just wanted to let you guys know that this article was linked to by Seed, here! Good work. -- Gwern (contribs) 20:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

I just deleted the incorrect assertion that "Chern" is pronounced "Chen". In fact, I knew Chern, and he pronounced his name "Churn". In Chinese, this is apparently a regional (dialect) pronunciation of the name "Chen", but Chern wisely chose a non-standard transliteration in order to avoid confusion with the many other mathematicians named Chen.