Talk:Cellular automaton/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: —focus 02:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to fail articles, but I definitely do not think that this meets the GA criteria. The most obvious problem is references — there are paragraphs; even whole sections without any inline citation. There are also several citation needed tags which must be addressed. Just due to this I believe it fails the quick-fail criteria. I'd also recommend a thorough copyedit, and perhaps a peer review. Better luck next time. —focus 02:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]