Talk:Catheter lock solution
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Redirect?
I think this article should just be a redirect to here. I don't think there is even enought to merge and redirect and five sources to support one sentence seems a bit excessive. CV9933 (talk) 20:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- Are their other solutions? Maybe move taurolidine here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Well we could just do nothing, maybe just sort out the references, but my take is that first and foremost Taurolidine is a chemical and one of it’s uses is as a catheter lock solution. Catheter lock solution (this article) on the other hand would fit neatly into the Taurolidine article under medical uses. I seriously doubt that it could be expanded any further here, but if it could in the future, then it would be simple enough to undo the redirect. CV9933 (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- perhaps more opinions are needed(though Doc James point is interesting)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Well we could just do nothing, maybe just sort out the references, but my take is that first and foremost Taurolidine is a chemical and one of it’s uses is as a catheter lock solution. Catheter lock solution (this article) on the other hand would fit neatly into the Taurolidine article under medical uses. I seriously doubt that it could be expanded any further here, but if it could in the future, then it would be simple enough to undo the redirect. CV9933 (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Are their other solutions? Maybe move taurolidine here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)