Jump to content

Talk:Cambridge Reference Sequence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Have anyone even read the paper on revised CRS?

https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1099_147


"The last suggestion represents a compromise between accuracy (correcting the numbering to account for the single C residue at nt 3,106 and 3,107) and" Valery Zapolodov (talk) 15:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]