Talk:C and D-class destroyer/GA1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Maybe add a couple images to the service section - right now it's pretty much a big "wall-o-text". This isn't a requirement for GA though, just a suggestion.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Everything looks to be in order, excellent work as usual, Sturmvogel. Parsecboy (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]