Talk:Anger function

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anger function/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Would someone know why other references I have found speaking of the Lommel-Weber function define it as

\Omega _{n}(x)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\int _{0}^{\pi }\sin(x\sin \phi -n\phi )d\phi

particularly ^[1].

This would seem to be the same as the Weber function mentioned here with the addition of a negative sign. If this is correct, it would be a notable fact.

Dvaselaar (talk) 22:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 01:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

References

^ Airey, J. R., "The Lommel-Weber $\Omega$ Function and its Application to the Problem of Electric Waves on a Thin Anchor Ring", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, Vol. 94, No. 661 (May 1, 1918), pp. 307-314

[1] Airey, J. R., "The Lommel-Weber $\Omega$ Function and its Application to the Problem of Electric Waves on a Thin Anchor Ring", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, Vol. 94, No. 661 (May 1, 1918), pp. 307-314

[1]