The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
A fact from 2011 Vasylkiv terror plot appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Regarding this edit (and to prevent an edit war ): I think the 10 Jan. 2014 clashes (caused by the verdict in this alleged 2011 Lenin statue bomb plot) have nothing to do with Euromaidan... And I think it is just a coincidence that people also involved in Euromaidan got caught up in the 10 Jan. 2014 clashes (a.k.a. by accident). Hence I think Category:Political scandals in Ukraine; −Category:Riots and civil disorder in Ukraine; −Category:Protests in Ukraine should be reinstated in this article. (And Category:Euromaidan should stay because this Wiki-article and Euromaidan are loosely linked). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me!21:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Also, seeing as they were convicted, they can no longer be 'alleged' by definition. Whether the allegations were proven true in a show trial is a whole 'nother matter but that POV shouldn't be prominent in the title - keep it neutral --Львівське (говорити) 18:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
+ 1 source... OK; I agree Vasylkiv terrorists case seems to be the most used in English to describe the events. At the time I wrote the article I could find this not... So I decided to take Alleged 2007 bomb plot in Copenhagen as an example-tittle.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yulia Romero (talk • contribs)
The article goes directly from allegations to the sentencing and protests. It needs to explicitly say that the accused were found guilty. Kablammo (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
): I think the 10 Jan. 2014 clashes (caused by the verdict in this alleged 2011 Lenin statue bomb plot) have nothing to do with Euromaidan... And I think it is just a coincidence that people also involved in Euromaidan got caught up in the 10 Jan. 2014 clashes (a.k.a. by accident). Hence I think Category:Political scandals in Ukraine; −Category:Riots and civil disorder in Ukraine; −Category:Protests in Ukraine should be reinstated in this article. (And Category:Euromaidan should stay because this Wiki-article and Euromaidan are loosely linked). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
