Jump to content

Poloidal–toroidal decomposition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

In vector calculus, a topic in pure and applied mathematics, a poloidal–toroidal decomposition is a restricted form of the Helmholtz decomposition. It is often used in the spherical coordinates analysis of solenoidal vector fields, for example, magnetic fields and incompressible fluids.[1]

Definition

For a three-dimensional vector field F with zero divergence

this can be expressed as the sum of a toroidal field and poloidal vector field

where is a radial vector in spherical coordinates . The toroidal field is obtained from a scalar field,,[2] as the following curl,

and the poloidal field is derived from another scalar field ,[3] as a twice-iterated curl,

This decomposition is symmetric in that the curl of a toroidal field is poloidal, and the curl of a poloidal field is toroidal, known as Chandrasekhar–Kendall function.[4]

Geometry

A toroidal vector field is tangential to spheres around the origin,[4]

while the curl of a poloidal field is tangential to those spheres

[5]

The poloidal–toroidal decomposition is unique if it is required that the average of the scalar fields Ψ and Φ vanishes on every sphere of radius r.[3]

Cartesian decomposition

A poloidal–toroidal decomposition also exists in Cartesian coordinates, but a mean-field flow has to be included in this case. For example, every solenoidal vector field can be written as

where denote the unit vectors in the coordinate directions.[6]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (1961). Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford: Clarendon. See discussion on page 622.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  2. ^ Backus 1986, p. 87.
  3. ^ a b Backus 1986, p. 88.
  4. ^ a b Backus, Parker & Constable 1996, p. 178.
  5. ^ Backus, Parker & Constable 1996, p. 179.
  6. ^ Jones 2008, p. 17.

References