Jump to content

Help talk:Overview of referencing styles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Merge

I wonder if this should be merged with WP:Verification methods and Wikipedia:Citing sources/Example edits for different methods. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I created this to help editors identify what style an article uses. Merging itinto something else looses that point, unless it is kept as a section. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 10:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dated?

I like the markup for the examples- it is really clear. I am currently looking (with despair) at all the referencing help pages, an FA reviews ahead of a edit-a-thon I am doing for a learned society.

There needs to be two extra sections to be current, and maybe a third if anyone ever uses Visual Editor.

  • There needs to be a basic section
   
<ref> Shove as much detail as you can in freetext and come back later </ref> 

This is what a lot of newbies will see when they start trying to improve a stub.

  • {{harvnb|Smith|1882|p=470}}- without the use of {{sfn}} s This style appears on FAs while {{sfn}} are still rare.
  • I don't see much point in comparing the merits of Footnote3 when it is now historic- but thanks for explaining it to me. More to the point would be a comparison between cite.php / sfn/ Harvnb. All occur in some number in FAs
  • There must be a better name for cite.php referencing. Similarly the habit of calling harvnbs parenthesical-style should be discussed even it it is to explain to me how to spell and pronounce the word.
  • sfns must explain efns

Any comments- I like to know before I start interfering. Nice mark-up I am taking it as a souvenir. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ClemRutter: The {{harvnb}} template is not generally used for parenthetical referencing because it lacks parentheses, that's why it has "nb" - i.e. "no brackets"; it's normally placed inside <ref>...</ref> tags. Parenthetical referencing is achieved using {{harv}}, see for example Actuary. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

academic styles

I thought that this article would indicate whether Wikipedia supports Modern Language Association Style Guide or APA style in its citation style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rootsmusic (talkcontribs) 19:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rootsmusic: As noted at WP:CITESTYLE, Wikipedia does not have a single house style, though citations within any given article should follow a consistent style. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]