Abstract rewriting machine
It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "Abstract rewriting machine" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR Timestamp: 20210106173646 17:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
The Abstract Rewriting Machine (ARM) is a virtual machine which implements term rewriting for minimal term rewriting systems.
Minimal term rewriting systems are left-linear term rewriting systems in which each rule takes on one of six forms:
- Continuation
- Return
- Match
- Add
- Delete
- Ident
Each of these six forms is mapped (in ARM) to one or a few processor instructions on most contemporary micro processors. Accordingly, minimal term rewriting is achieved at tens to hundreds of clock cycles per reduction step—millions of reduction steps per second.
ARM implements general term rewriting, in that every single-sorted unconditional left-linear term rewriting system can be transformed (compiled) into a minimal term rewriting system that gives rise to the same normal form relation.
An overview with references to this compilation process for innermost rewriting, as well as a detailed overview of ARM, can be found in "Within ARM's reach: compilation of left-linear rewrite systems via minimal rewrite systems". A description for lazy (non-innermost) rewriting can be found in "Lazy rewriting on eager machinery".
A documented implementation of ARM (with the term rewriting language Epic) is available here. Note that site and software are no longer being actively maintained.
References
- Giesl, J. R.; Middeldorp, A. (July 2004). "Transformation techniques for context-sensitive rewrite systems" (PDF). Journal of Functional Programming. 14 (4): 379–427. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.127.2817. doi:10.1017/S0956796803004945.
- Lucas, Salvador (2002). "Lazy Rewriting and Context-Sensitive Rewriting" (PDF). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. 64: 234–254. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.14.3470. doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80353-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-05-16. Retrieved 2015-08-29.
- Nguyen, Quang-Huy (2001). "Compact Normalisation Trace via Lazy Rewriting" (PDF). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. 57: 87–108. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.24.771. doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(04)00269-5.
- Schernhammer, F.; Gramlich, B. (April 2008). "Termination of Lazy Rewriting Revisited" (PDF). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. 204: 35–51. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.142.1957. doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2008.03.052.