Talk:ECrew Development Program

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Articles for creation Start‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 December 2020 by reviewer SK2242 (talk · contribs).

Video games Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Mycat (0 participants)
Pixonic (2 participants)
Heartbound (video game) (12 participants)
Puppet Combo (4 participants)
Project Moon (2 participants)
Zoë Mode (0 participants)
Shafik Quoraishee (6 participants)
Cat Daddy Games (2 participants)
Wolfire Games (4 participants)
Mercenaries (series) (1 participant)
Blacknorth (3 participants)
DigitalMania (6 participants)
Brace Yourself Games (2 participants)
Dejobaan Games (5 participants)
Characters of the Kirby series (5 participants)
BitComposer Interactive (2 participants; relisted)
Big Robot (2 participants; relisted)
BlitWorks (2 participants; relisted)
KiriKiri (3 participants; relisted)
Random map (5 participants; relisted)
List of Bemani musicians (5 participants; relisted)
Stormind Games (5 participants; relisted)
Black Widow Games (6 participants; relisted)
Doublesix (9 participants; relisted)
Aggro Crab (5 participants; relisted)
Dan Bull (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Who should be credited as developer and publisher?

Me, @ImPurpl3: and @Tooadman: have been editing back and forth the developer label in the infobox. They claim that the developer is unknown and should read as such, and I disagree. My case is that the sources describe McD and Nintendo as developers, as:

[1] says "McDonald's Japan is currently developing [eCDP]",
[2] says "The chain is developing a DS training program",
[3] says "McDonald's has developed software",

I an fully aware that the game and its conception is shrouded in mystery, and perhaps it was outsourced to some unknown game studio. However, the sources all clearly specify McD as developer - and without clear evidence of the contrary our content should not contradict the very sources cited. Can't we agree?

And as for the publisher label, it should by all means also read "McDonald's" as they're the masters of their own game's distribution. Gaioa (T C L) 10:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]