Strong and weak sampling
![]() | It is requested that the deleted page history of Draft:Strong and weak sampling be undeleted and merged into the history of this page because draft copy and pasted here; not page moved This action must be performed by an administrator or importer (compare pages).
Consider placing Administrators: Before merging the page histories, read the instructions at Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves carefully. An incorrect history merge is very difficult to undo. Also check Wikipedia:Requests for history merge for possible explanation of complex cases. |
Strong and weak sampling are two sampling approach[1] in Statistics, and are popular in computational cognitive science and language learning[2]. In strong sampling, it is assumed that the data are intentionally generated as positive examples of a concept[3], while in weak sampling, it is assumed that the data are generated without any restrictions.[4]
Formal Definition
In strong sampling, we assume observation is randomly sampled from the true hypothesis:
In weak sampling, we assume observations randomly sampled and then classified:
Consequence: Posterior computation under Weak Sampling
Therefore the likelihood will be "ignored".
References
- ^ Xu, Fei. "Bayesian word learning Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning" (PDF). MIT. Developmental Science.
- ^ Hsu, Anne. "Sampling assumptions in language learning 1 Running head: SAMPLING ASSUMPTIONS IN LANGUAGE LEARNING Sampling assumptions affect use of indirect negative evidence in language learning". ResearchGate.
- ^ Navarro, Danielle. "Lecture 20: Strong vs weak sampling" (PDF). Computational Cognitive Science.
- ^ Navarro, Daniel (2012). "Sampling assumptions in inductive generalization". Cognitive Science. 36 (2): 187–223. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01212.x. PMID 22141440.