Jump to content

Strong and weak sampling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 06:38, 23 December 2020 (Alter: journal. Add: pages, year. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Ost316 | Category:AfC pending submissions by age/9 days ago‎ | via #UCB_Category 6/49). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
  • Comment: Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Strong and weak sampling are two sampling approach[1] in Statistics, and are popular in computational cognitive science and language learning[2]. In strong sampling, it is assumed that the data are intentionally generated as positive examples of a concept[3], while in weak sampling, it is assumed that the data are generated without any restrictions.[4]

Formal Definition

In strong sampling, we assume observation is randomly sampled from the true hypothesis:

In weak sampling, we assume observations randomly sampled and then classified:

Consequence: Posterior computation under Weak Sampling

Therefore the likelihood will be "ignored".

References

  1. ^ Xu, Fei. "Bayesian word learning Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning" (PDF). MIT. Developmental Science.
  2. ^ Hsu, Anne. "Sampling assumptions in language learning 1 Running head: SAMPLING ASSUMPTIONS IN LANGUAGE LEARNING Sampling assumptions affect use of indirect negative evidence in language learning". ResearchGate.
  3. ^ Navarro, Danielle. "Lecture 20: Strong vs weak sampling" (PDF). Computational Cognitive Science.
  4. ^ Navarro, Daniel (2012). "Sampling assumptions in inductive generalization". Cognitive Science. 36 (2): 187–223. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01212.x. PMID 22141440.

Category:Statistics

multiple references added