User talk:Jetstreamer

KLM

Why have you deleted an edit because you claim the Parliament of the United Kingdom records are 'Original Research'? At least click the to read it. I can see that from the comments below you are far more concerned with deleting reliable information on Wikipedia in favour of ensuring this website is fan fiction created by you. You are a joke.

Reversion in TAP Portugal

I don't know what kind of reversion you may have made in TAP Portugal page according to your justification, since TAP Portugal doesn't fly to Tel Aviv, nor any other city in Asia. Nupest 0:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Finding reliable source

Hi jetstremar I am runaparvin you told me if I want to add anything I have to add a reliable source but how can I add a reliable source changing the destinations? Please help me adding a reliable source but I can't understand why not you changing the page of us-bangla airlines.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Runaparvin (talk • contribs)

Now 18th worst disaster

And still the 4th worst *at the time*. Please read the commit / diff information "Jetstreamer" before reverting changes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_New_Zealand_Flight_901 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voigty (talk • contribs)

hi, here is the info for KLM year round Bilbao service

http://news.klm.com/air-france-klm-2014-15-winter-schedule-26-october-2014--28-march-2015-en/

Air France-KLM 2014-15 winter schedule (26 October 2014 – 28 March 2015) KLM continue to serve the routes launched this summer: to Bilbao (Spain) and Zagreb (Croatia).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.27.46 (talk • contribs)

Re: Ethiopian Airlines accidents and incidents

Hello, Jetstreamer. You have new messages at Mattwheatley's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: 1979 Dniprodzerzhynsk mid-air collisіon

Hello, Jetstreamer. You have new messages at Amateur55's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aeroflot 593

Hello Jetstreamer: Wow you caught me as Im about to go get some sleep :) so I guess to the point, lol..ok Aeroflot 593, about the Boeing 737 next to it, I'm agreeing with you, not 100 percent but certainly enough to tell you I see your point, and you are probably correct. About listing the Jessica Dubroff article there, I put an explanation as why she-or should I say, it-should be on the "see also" list right next to the link itself. I mean to me they were similar because they were both instances in which children were in the cockpit during a tragic circumstance. Anyways, take care, God bless you!...Antonio AeroCrazyLot Martin (loser's talk page) 13:55, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Air Namibia accra/Lagos routing

Please note that Air Namibia 'resumes' the Accra route which they've abandoned in 2013. The Lagos-leg, however is new, therefore 'begins'. Please correct this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bundubear (talk • contribs) 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

I thought Aeromexico Connect took over Aeromexico’s main Monterrey-Las Vegas route. My apologies.

Robbie2448 ^Talk 12:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

JFK as a LATAM Chile destination from EZE.

Stop adding JFK as a destination from EZE with LATAM Chile, although bookable there is not a nonstop flight, if we start adding direct flights to airport's pages it will be a real mess as we will have to add every direct flight offered by an airline worldwide, there must be a change in the politics of publishing that. I will be reverting any changes you make because believe me that I am familiarized with Wikpedia's WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, so I cite the following: "However, avoid listing direct flights that contain a stop at a domestic hub, as virtually all of these are simply flights from one "spoke city" to a hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city. Furthermore, these flights often involve plane changes, despite the direct designation. Including these flights dramatically increases the length of destination listings, artificially inflates the airline's presence at a location and requires constant updating, as these "timetable direct" destinations have little rhyme or reason and may change as often as every week or two."

So it means that you are wrong and you should not post JFK as a destination with LATAM Chile because it is a stop at a domestic hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city.

Hello

Hi, you left a message on my talk page. I’m not sure weather you saw it because you never got back to me. I’m still learning and I am really not good at citing sources. I am not trying to vandalize here, I love Wikipedia and I’ve been reading for a long time. To me, contributing is my way to give back, I feel bad for not donating but contributing is my way to give back to the community. AdamT777 23:06 (UTC) 21 May 2020

Turkish Airlines

If you know, I have already removed TK from ESB as hub cause TK fleet from ESB per FR24 were all operating by AnadoluJet. ScienticGuy (talk) 02:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Qatar Airways

I just wanted to drop you a note and apologize for reverting you [1]. It was strictly an accidental "finger problem", as I was actually trying to send you a "thanks" for that edit! - Ahunt (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Never mind.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Virgin Australia as a Flag Carrier of Australia

I've noticed that you've reverted several attempts by other members to remove Virgin Australia as a flag/national carrier of Australia.

While it is true that the article cited calls Virgin Australia a national carrier, the article itself then goes on to explain that it's only in a strict legal sense for the purposes of "accessing flight routes". That is where the case for national carrier starts and ends.

I would like to point out that the flag carrier article itself states that "Today, it is any international airline with a strong connection to its home country or that represents its home country internationally, regardless of whether it is government-owned." for good reason; this is the common meaning of "flag/national carrier" which 99% of people will think of.

If you ask any Australian, the only airline that one thinks of when one thinks of the carrier of Australia is Qantas because it is

a) Previously government owned

b) Mandated to be at least 51% Australian owned

c) Has a long history, unlike Virgin Australia which was established in 2000 as opposed to 1920 for Qantas

d) It is the one and only national carrier in the minds of actual Australians

There are several reasons why Virgin Australia would not be considered as a flag/national carrier by anyone other than a lawyer

a) As previously mentioned, has a very short history in Australia.

b) Almost completely foreign owned

c) Couldn't even muster a bailout or loan from the Australian government when it went into administration, which would absolutely not be the case if it was considered the common meaning of "national/flag carrier" given the political implications of letting the "national/flag carrier" go into administration.

tl;dr Virgin Australia fulfils almost no criteria of the common meaning of "flag/national" carrier. It is only technically a national carrier for regulatory purposes.

May I please request that you stop reverting attempts to delist Virgin Australia as a flag carrier of Australia

BoxQatar (talk) 11:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

I fully understand your reasons but WP:VNT applies. I believe this is a matter to be raised at the article's talk.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)