Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Pascal.Tesson

User:Pascal.Tesson

      run at Sun Jan 7 16:45:32 2007 GMT

Category talk:	57
Category:	212
Image:	12
Mainspace	4947
Portal:	1
Talk:	316
Template talk:	7
Template:	24
User talk:	1471
User:	73
Wikipedia talk:	307
Wikipedia:	1599
avg edits per article	1.49
earliest	18:22, 19 April 2006
number of unique articles	6040
total	9026

Moved from main page

It's not a good idea to say that editors are wasting everyone's time and apparently driving competent people away from Wikipedia when superficially delving into a content dispute. That is problematic -- Samir धर्म 17:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In all fairness this is a message I left to an individual editor (in response to her own [1]), giving my own take on things and reminding her that I have no competence to judge the matter in full. The very same message also explains why page protection is a good thing and suggests filing an RfC to obtain better input from the rest of the community. And I do believe that a number of disruptive editors are "wasting everyone's time and apparently driving competent people away from Wikipedia". Perhaps I was wrong in my evaluation that Droliver is one such editor but I firmly believe that many competent people don't have the patience to deal with systematic point-of-view pushing and that this is a real problem affecting Wikipedia as a whole. Pascal.Tesson 17:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]