Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Cplot

Here's another to check out: User:WhyAllThisAnimosity. —Doug Bell ^talk 16:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reported on the project page and permablocked. Thanks, Doug.--Kchase T 17:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Range blocks

Note that two range blocks were applied on Dec 4 for 48 hours. They are on 68.30.0.0/16 and 70.8.0.0/16. These blocks may need to be renewed as Cplot has shown no sign of letting up on his activities. More blocks may be needed on other ranges as there have been reports of Cplot getting around the block. A checkuser request is pending to try and nail down the ranges. --StuffOfInterest 02:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leftover propaganda

Due to links to my talk page, I've been able to trace a few sock talk pages which still have Cplots propaganda diatribe. The ones I've noticed are:

I'm curious if those pages should be left for future evidence or deleted to deny Cplot a platform? --StuffOfInterest 20:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been redirecting them, but since he knows how to do links to historical page versions, that's not a solid solution. They should probably be deleted by an admin. --tjstrf talk 04:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Cplot?

I'm not sure if this is the right place to discuss it, but here it is.

RandofThieves was blocked after a rather trollish post to the WP:Help desk. If you pull up the history for the Help Desk, there's been a series of identical posts by users, such as ThouDothProtestTooStrongly,207.168.161.13, 67.173.127.205, 24.148.91.147, 75.3.9.12, & 66.73.80.206. At least one of the IPs has been labelled a potential sock puppet of Cplot. All have been blocked, thanks to a helpful admin, but I thought it might be worth pointing out here, due to the label of one IP as a potential Cplot puppet. -- Kesh 03:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]