Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2018/January

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2018. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Proposals, January 2018

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

Category:Andalusia stubs / {{Andalusia-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.

I created the category and template moments ago, before I remembered stub types are supposed to be proposed here first; mea culpa, and I'll gladly undo my edits (and delete the template and category) if others think it's not needed. The structure would be:

Category:Andalusia stubs/{{Andalusia-stub}}/{{Andalusia-bio-stub}}
- Category:Andalusia geography stubs/{{Andalusia-geo-stub}} — already existed

There are 1,800+ articles in Category:Andalusia (depth: 10) and Category:Stub-Class Spain articles, so I'm sure there will be more than 60 members once I've populated it (holding off currently pending others' feedback). -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

{{Jaén-struct-stub}} and {{Málaga-struct-stub}} now also populate the category. There's also Category:Province of Cádiz building and structure stubs/{{Cádiz-struct-stub}}, but I'm not sure if the template should populate Category:Andalusia stubs or if the Cádiz category should be made a subcategory of Category:Andalusia stubs. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 01:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

As there isn't a category for Andalusian structure stubs, I'd leave the Cádiz structure stub category where it is, as a sub-cat of Spanish building and structure stubs. Pegship (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.