Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabble.ca
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rabble.ca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable per WP:GNG, being associated with notable people doesn't give weight per WP:INHERITORG/WP:INHERITWEB, and fame/userbase≠notability per WP:INHERENTWEB. 17jiangz1 (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. 17jiangz1 (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. 17jiangz1 (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. 17jiangz1 (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. 17jiangz1 (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The problem here isn't that the publication fails WP:GNG; it's that because it's been around for 20 years a lot of its GNG-building coverage doesn't Google well (Google is useless for finding media coverage older than a couple of years) and has to be retrieved from news archives. On a ProQuest search, however, I have this up to ten footnotes and counting, which is more than enough to salvage it. This isn't a topic that fails our notability standards, it's just an old article that didn't get improved to keep up with the evolution in our content standards since the article was first created in 2004, and it's now been significantly repaired. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)