Module talk:Parameter validation
Appearance
Module improvements
Following up from Template_talk:Infobox_station#Parameter_validation:
- Userspace: No, perhaps not. Depends entirely on the template, but for infoboxes I suppose that may be correct. Editors may use a infobox on their main userpage though. Should that be categorised, if they're using invalid params? The module has flexibility to allow templates to do as they choose, so it's mostly a question of what's the sane default.
- Hmm, yes, that would be a good idea. I will see what I can do.
- The config page doesn't currently have knowledge of the number of entries in the list, which lies in the module. We can do "unknown parameter(s)"?