Jump to content

TEM-function

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Headbomb (talk | contribs) at 13:59, 26 September 2020 (Alter: journal, url, pages. Add: page, volume, doi. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. | You can use this tool yourself. Report bugs here. | via #UCB_Gadget). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In petroleum engineering, TEM (True Effective Mobility), also called TEM-function, is a criterion to characterize dynamic two-phase flow characteristics of rocks (or dynamic rock quality). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] TEM is a function of Relative permeability, Porosity, absolute Permeability and fluid Viscosity, and can be determined for each fluid phase separately. TEM-function has been derived from Darcy's law for multiphase flow. [1]

in which k is the absolute Permeability, kr is the Relative permeability, φ is the Porosity, and μ is the fluid Viscosity. Rocks with better fluid dynamics (i.e., experiencing a lower pressure drop in conducting a fluid phase) have higher TEM versus saturation curves. Rocks with lower TEM versus saturation curves resemble low quality systems.[1]

TEM-function in analyzing Relative permeability data is analogous with Leverett J-function in analyzing Capillary pressure data. Furthermore, TEM-function in two-phase flow systems is extension of RQI (Rock Quality Index) for single-phase systems. [1]

Also, TEM-function can be used for averaging relative permeability curves (for each fluid phase, separately (i.e., water, oil, gas, CO2)).[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Mirzaei-Paiaman, A.; Saboorian-Jooybari, H.; Chen, Z.; Ostadhassan, M. (2019). "New technique of True Effective Mobility (TEM-Function) in dynamic rock typing: Reduction of uncertainties in relative permeability data for reservoir simulation". doi:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.06.003. Retrieved 6 August 2020. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. ^ Mirzaei-Paiaman, A.; Asadolahpour, S.R.; Saboorian-Jooybari, H.; Chen, Z.; Ostadhassan, M. (2020). "A new framework for selection of representative samples for special core analysis". Petroleum Research. doi:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.06.003. Retrieved 6 August 2020.]
  3. ^ Mirzaei-Paiaman, A. (2019). "New Concept of Dynamic Rock Typing and Necessity of Modifying Current Reservoir Simulators" (PDF). SPE Review London: 7–10. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  4. ^ Faramarzi-Palangar, M. (2020). "Investigating dynamic rock quality in two-phase flow systems using TEM-function: A comparative study of different rock typing indices". Petroleum Research. doi:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.08.001. Retrieved 18 August 2020.
  5. ^ Wang, R. (2019). "Grid density overlapping hierarchical algorithm for clustering of carbonate reservoir rock types: A case from Mishrif Formation of West Qurna-1 oilfield, Iraq". Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 182: 106209. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106209. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  6. ^ Noorbakhsh, A. (2020). "Field Production Optimization Using Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) Algorithm in ESP-Implemented Wells, A Comparison Approach". Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  7. ^ Nazari, M.H. (2019). "Investigation of factors influencing geological heterogeneity in tight gas carbonates, Permian reservoir of the Persian Gulf". Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 183: 106341. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106341. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  8. ^ Liu, Y. (2019). "Petrophysical static rock typing for carbonate reservoirs based on mercury injection capillary pressure curves using principal component analysis". Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 181: 106175. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.06.039. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  9. ^ Shakiba, M. (2020). "An experimental investigation of the proportion of mortar components on physical and geomechanical characteristics of unconsolidated artificial reservoir sandstones". Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 189: 107022. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107022. Retrieved 6 August 2020.