Talk:D'Assas-class cruiser

D'Assas-class cruiser is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by Parsecboy (talk) at 19:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:D'Assas-class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 17:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if for the displacement in the infobox, you should provide the range, since it was not consistent between all three ships
- Good idea
Add range to the infobox, unless you deem it problematic since two different ranges are given (yes, I'm a very big fan of infoboxen)
- Done
"The ships were armed with a main battery of six 164 mm (6.5 in) Modèle 1893 45-caliber guns. They were placed in individual pivot mounts; one was on the forecastle, two were in sponsons abreast the conning tower, and the last was on the stern" - Maybe I'm under/overthinking this, but 1x forecastle + 2x conning tower + 1x stern = 4, not 6. Also indicate which conning tower: the primary or the secondary.
- Good catch, I forgot to mention the other pair
", and explosive armor-piercing" - Gloss the AP abbreviation here, because you use it later
- Done
Do sources indicate how many torpedos the ships carried?
- No, unfortunately
"At the start of World War I in August 1914, she initially operated out of Morocco, patrolling for German U-boats" - Weird phrasing here. The last ship mentioned was sold for scrap, so it's unclear which exact one she is (I'm assuming Cassard)
- Clarified

I think that's it. A tidy little article. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review! Parsecboy (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]