User talk:PythonSwarm
Please sign your messages by appending ~~~~ at the end of them. |
| What you type | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| ~~~ | Name (Talk) |
| ~~~~ or ~~~~~~~~ | Name (Talk) +Timestamp |
| ~~~~~ | Timestamp |
Please note that this page is under autoarchival with a time limit of three days. Archives
Archival of your talkpage
I begin by referencing WP:TALKPAGE, you're talkpage is yours to do as you please. I now kindly ask you to please let topics mature before archiving, both for the sake of other editors, and for yourself. I personally like to keep a rolling months worth of topics on my page, both so other editors can look at involvement with the wiki, as well as other users. It's also useful as a reminder of any warnings or encouragement I've received. Reminding yourself of things is never bad.
Again, it is yours to do as you please and nobody can force you to do anything. Thepenguin9 (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. -- PythonSwarm Talk | Contribs | Global 04:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Could you recheck the copyvio? I checked the source that it says I copied from and flat out I've never seen it before - and when you click on that link it's just a mumbled mess of text. I'm happy to work on the other issue you found and I don't expect it to be anywhere near perfect as it's my first "good article" attempt, but I don't agree with the speedy-fail given that I didn't copy any of it and I can't tell you how that happened. If I need to reword that section (which was written completely by me as the entire article was), I certainly can - but it isn't a copy, I guarantee it. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 04:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Berchanhimez: What the others would think of when they see this? I suggest you rewrite that part as well. -- PythonSwarm T | C | G 04:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- PythonSwarm, I think personally that they'd see that the site that it's "copied" from is not one that's anything I'd ever find, and I personally have my opinion that the site likely "crawled" the internet and copied parts from multiple webpages itself - not the other way around like you said. Regardless, if you had pinged me and asked for clarification or for a rewrite, I would've been happy to - I'm not sure why you decided to completely fail the article based on one minor concern (which again, I disagree with). I've asked for a second opinion on the talk page for good article nominations. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 05:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Berchanhimez I think yes. changed to On Hold.
- PythonSwarm, I think personally that they'd see that the site that it's "copied" from is not one that's anything I'd ever find, and I personally have my opinion that the site likely "crawled" the internet and copied parts from multiple webpages itself - not the other way around like you said. Regardless, if you had pinged me and asked for clarification or for a rewrite, I would've been happy to - I'm not sure why you decided to completely fail the article based on one minor concern (which again, I disagree with). I've asked for a second opinion on the talk page for good article nominations. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 05:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Berchanhimez: What the others would think of when they see this? I suggest you rewrite that part as well. -- PythonSwarm T | C | G 04:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)