Jump to content

Talk:Divine command theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Saturdayopen (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 9 September 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Good articleDivine command theory has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2012Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics / Religion GA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Ethics
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of religion

Fails to distinguish divine command obediance from divine command theory.

The ethical position that one ought to obey divine commands is a different idea from the meta-ethical position of divine command theory: that the good is whatever the divine command is. This article fails to distinguish between the two and this needs to be covered somehow. --BenMcLean (talk) 05:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ben, thanks for you comment. I can't find any sources which make that distinction at all; do you know of anything that we could use? ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 17:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aquinas

Should he be in this article? He's not someone I think most would call a theological voluntarist. And the section on his views makes it difficult to tell if he accepts the DCT as offered or if he's a theological voluntarist.68.80.130.184 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Wainwright

This article mentions a philosopher called William Wainwright. I have just looked up William Wainwright on Wikipedia and found that there are several people with this name who have articles in Wikipedia, but none of them are philosophers. Vorbee (talk) 17:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]