Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discrete dipole approximation codes
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Discrete dipole approximation codes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I wrote this page originally together with another one: "Discrete dipole approximation". But I merged them together recently and extended table of codes. Therefore this page is obsolete and should be now deleted. I think it can be speedy deleted. Puncinus (talk)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 29. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect: I agree that the description of the method (DDA) and the codes are better together in a single page. But instead of deleting this page, I propose to make a redirect to Discrete_dipole_approximation#Discrete_Dipole_Approximation_Codes, as described in Wikipedia:Redirect. This will keep the existing links to this page operational. But I am not sure how exactly the redirect should be implemented (accompanied with removing content from this page) (User:Myurkin) —Preceding undated comment added 03:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Myurkin: I have explicitly marked your contribution as a redirect !vote in order this debate can continue in a regular manner. If at the end of the debate the closer determines the result should be a redirect they will likely do that; but in that instance if you need help refining that to a redirect to section then feel free to contact me on my page or ping me on the article page talk. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect If the content was merged, then per WP:MERGE, the page should be redirected to preserve attributions and history. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
17:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC) - Redirect: I think it would be appropriate to redirect it to the DDA article if they are already merged. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)