Jump to content

TEM-function

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2804:431:f714:70a1:e048:b69f:1328:7a58 (talk) at 14:28, 6 August 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In petroleum engineering, TEM (True Effective Mobility), also called TEM-function, is a criterion to characterize dynamic fluid-flow characteristics of rocks (or dynamic rock quality). [1][2][3][4][5]TEM is a function of Relative permeability, Porosity, absolute Permeability and fluid Viscosity, and can be determined for each fluid phase separately. TEM-function has been derived from Darcy's law for multiphase flow. [1]

in which k is the absolute Permeability, kr is the Relative permeability, φ is the Porosity, and μ is the fluid Viscosity. Rocks with better fluid dynamics (i.e., experiencing a lower pressure drop in conducting a fluid phase) have higher TEM versus saturation curves. Rocks with lower TEM versus saturation curves resemble low quality systems.[1]

TEM-function in analyzing Relative permeability data is analogous with Leverett J-function in analyzing Capillary pressure data.[1]

Also, TEM-function can be used for averaging relative permeability curves (for each fluid phase, separately (i.e., water, oil, gas, CO2)).[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Mirzaei-Paiaman, A.; Saboorian-Jooybari, H.; Chen, Z.; Ostadhassan, M. (2019). "New technique of True Effective Mobility (TEM-Function) in dynamic rock typing: Reduction of uncertainties in relative permeability data for reservoir simulation". Article Published in Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering - JPSE - by Elsevier B.V., August, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.06.003. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  2. ^ Mirzaei-Paiaman, A.; Asadolahpour, S.R.; Saboorian-Jooybari, H.; Chen, Z.; Ostadhassan, M. (2020). "A new framework for selection of representative samples for special core analysis". Article Published in Petroleum Research by Elsevier B.V., 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.06.003. Retrieved 6 August 2020.]
  3. ^ Mirzaei-Paiaman, A. (2019). "New Concept of Dynamic Rock Typing and Necessity of Modifying Current Reservoir Simulators" (PDF). Technical Feature Article Published in SPE Review London e-Magazine by Society of Petroleum Engineers' London Branch, June, 2019: 7–10. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  4. ^ Wang, R. (2019). "Grid density overlapping hierarchical algorithm for clustering of carbonate reservoir rock types: A case from Mishrif Formation of West Qurna-1 oilfield, Iraq". Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering by Elsevier: -. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  5. ^ Noorbakhsh, A. (2020). "Field Production Optimization Using Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) Algorithm in ESP-Implemented Wells, A Comparison Approach". Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology by RIPI: -. Retrieved 6 August 2020.