Jump to content

Phase-space wavefunctions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GustavoPetronilo (talk | contribs) at 00:49, 2 August 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The wave-function approach of quantum mechanics in phase space is a formulation of quantum mechanics elaborating the phase-space formulation with a Hilbert space. Thus, it is possible to assign a meaning to the wave function in phase space, . The wave function, , is associated to the Wigner distribution by means of the star product as .

A wave-function approach of quantum mechanics in phase space was introduced by Torres-Vega and Frederick in 1990[1] (also see[2][3][4][5][6]). In 2004 Oliveira et. al. developed a new wave-function formalism in phase space where the wave-fucntion is associated ti the Wigner quasiprobability distribution by means of the Moyal product[7] and it was followed by many authors [8][9][10][11][12]

An advantage might be that off-diagonal Wigner functions used in superpositions are treated in an intuitive way, , also gauge theories are treated in a operator form[13][14].

Wigner quasiprobability distribution

There exists a family of different representations of phase space distribution, and all are interrelated.[15][16] The most most popular is the Wigner representation, W(xp), and historically discovered first.[17] Other common representations are Glauber–Sudarshan P,[18][19] and Husimi Q.[20] Such alternatives are particularly useful where a particular form is taken by the Hamiltonian, such as normal order of Glauber – Sudarshan P-representation.

In the Wigner formalism the probability of a quantum system be in a interval of positions can be attributed to the Wigner functionintegrated over all momenta and the position interval

If Â(xp) is an operator representing an observable, it may be mapped to phase space as A(x, p) through the Wigner transform. Conversely, this operator may be recovered by the Weyl transform.

The expectation value of the observable with respect to the phase-space distribution is[21][22]

It should be noted that despite its appearance, W(xp) is not a genuine joint probability distribution, because regions under it do not represent mutually exclusive states, as required in the third axiom of probability theory. Moreover, it can, in general, take negative values even for pure states, with the unique exception of (optionally squeezed) coherent states, in violation of the first axiom.

Star product

In the Wigner representation of the phase space, the standard multiplication of operators is replaced by the Moyal product of functions in phase space and , represented by the symbol ,[23] as the mapping .

For a pair of functions and , the left and right derivatives are defined as

The definition of the star product in its differential form is given by

where the argument in the exponential function can be interpreted as a power series.

It is also possible to define the -product in a integral form,[24] essentially through the Fourier transform:

The star product is non-commutative,
.
It is associative
.
The complex conjugate is an antilinear antiautomorphism
.
The scalar function still the identity in the new algebra
.

Star Operators

Instead of thinking in terms multiplication of function using the star product, we can shift to think in terms of operators acting in functions in phase space

.

Thus, we can define the following operators

,

.

These operators satisfy the uncertainty principle[7],

.

Symplectic Hilbert Space

To associate the Hilbert space, , with the phase space , we will consider the set of complex functions of integrable square, in , such that

Then we can write , with

where is the dual vector of . This symplectic Hilbert space is denoted by

Thus, it is now, with aid of the star product possible to construct a Schrödinger picture in phase space for

,

deriving both side by , we have

,

therefore, the above has the same role of Schrödinger equation in usual quantum mechanics.

To show that , we take the 'Schrödinger equation' in phase space and 'star multiply' by the right for

,

where is the classical Hamiltonian of the system. And taking the complex conjugate

,

subtracting both equations we get

,

which is the time evolution of Wigner function, for this reason is sometimes called quasiamplitude of probability. The -genvalue is given by the time independent equation

.

Star multiplying for on the right, we obtain

.

Therefore the Wigner Distribution function is a -genfunction of the -genvalue equation[7].

Harmonic oscillator in phase space

Main article: quantum harmonic oscillator

The Wigner quasiprobability distribution of the quantum harmonic oscillator: a) n = 0, b) n = 1, c) n = 5.

The Hamiltonian of one dimensional simple harmonic oscillator is

.

The star operator is then given by

.

Thus the time evolution equation for the quasiamplitude of probability is

.

We can use separation of variables to get

,

with .

Choosing to be real, we can separate the real and imaginary part of the genvalue equation

,

and

.

This system of equations can be satisfied by

,

where is the Laguerre polinomial.

The Wigner function .

For the ground state we have

Therefore,

.

In General

The genvalue is

.

Torres-Vega Frederick representation

As it was states before, the first wave-function formulation of quantum mechanics was developed by Torres-Vega and Frederick,[1] its phase-space operators are given by

,

and

.

This operators are obtained transforming the operators and (developed in the same article) as

and

,

where .

This representation is some times associated with the Husimi distribution[1][25] and it was shown to coincides with the totality of coherent-state representations for the Heisenberg-Weyl group[26].

The Wigner quasiamplitude, , and Torres_Vega Frederick wave-function, , are related by

where and .[25]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Torres-Vega, Go.; Frederick, John (1990). "Quantum mechanics in phase space: New approaches to the correspondence principle". J. Chem. Phys. 93 (12): 8862–8873. doi:10.1063/1.459225.
  2. ^ Torres‐Vega, Go.; Frederick, John H. (1993-02-15). "A quantum mechanical representation in phase space". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 98 (4): 3103–3120. doi:10.1063/1.464085. ISSN 0021-9606.
  3. ^ Torres-Vega, Go.; Zúñiga-Segundo, A.; Morales-Guzmán, J. D. (1996-06-01). "Special functions and quantum mechanics in phase space: Airy functions". Physical Review A. 53 (6): 3792–3797. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.3792.
  4. ^ Mo/ller, Klaus B.; Jo/rgensen, Thomas G.; Torres-Vega, Gabino (1997-05-01). "On coherent-state representations of quantum mechanics: Wave mechanics in phase space". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 106 (17): 7228–7240. doi:10.1063/1.473684. ISSN 0021-9606.
  5. ^ Gosson, Maurice A de (2005-04-25). "Extended Weyl calculus and application to the phase-space Schrödinger equation". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 38 (19): L325 – L329. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/19/l01. ISSN 0305-4470.
  6. ^ Gosson, Maurice A de (2005-10-05). "Symplectically covariant Schrödinger equation in phase space". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 38 (42): 9263–9287. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/42/007. ISSN 0305-4470.
  7. ^ a b c Oliveira, M. D; Fernandes, M. C. B; Khanna, F. C; Santana, A. E; Vianna, J. D. M (2004-08-01). "Symplectic quantum mechanics". Annals of Physics. 312 (2): 492–510. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.03.009. ISSN 0003-4916.
  8. ^ Paiva, R. a. S.; Amorim, R. G. G.; Ulhoa, S. C.; Santana, A. E.; Khanna, F. C. (2020-01-08). "Zeeman Effect in Phase Space". Advances in High Energy Physics. Retrieved 2020-07-16.
  9. ^ Martins, A. X.; Paiva, R. a. S.; Petronilo, G.; Luz, R. R.; Amorim, R. G. G.; Ulhoa, S. C.; Filho, T. M. R. (2020-04-30). "Analytical Solution for the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation in Phase Space and Wigner Function". Advances in High Energy Physics. Retrieved 2020-07-16.
  10. ^ Petronilo, Gustavo Xavier Antunes; Ulhoa, Sergio Costa; Santana, Ademir Eugenio (2019-09-18). "Symplectic Field Theory of the Galilean Covariant Scalar and Spinor Representations". Ukrainian Journal of Physics. 64 (8): 719. doi:10.15407/ujpe64.8.719. ISSN 2071-0194.
  11. ^ Amorim, R. G. G.; Fernandes, M. C. B.; Khanna, F. C.; Santana, A. E.; Vianna, J. D. M. (2007-02-12). "Non-commutative geometry and symplectic field theory". Physics Letters A. 361 (6): 464–471. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.09.074. ISSN 0375-9601.
  12. ^ Costa, Caroline; Tenser, Marcia R.; Amorim, Ronni G. G.; Fernandes, Marco C. B.; Santana, Ademir E.; Vianna, J. David M. (2018-02-26). "Symplectic Field Theories: Scalar and Spinor Representations". Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras. 28 (1): 27. doi:10.1007/s00006-018-0840-4. ISSN 1661-4909.
  13. ^ Amorim, R. G. G.; Khanna, F. C.; Malbouisson, A. P. C.; Malbouisson, J. M. C.; Santana, A. E. (2015-07-30). "Realization of the noncommutative Seiberg–Witten gauge theory by fields in phase space". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 30 (22): 1550135. doi:10.1142/S0217751X15501353. ISSN 0217-751X.
  14. ^ Cruz-Filho, J. S.; Amorim, R. G. G.; Khanna, F. C.; Santana, A. E.; Santos, A. F.; Ulhoa, S. C. (2019-10-01). "Non-abelian Gauge Symmetry for Fields in Phase Space: a Realization of the Seiberg-Witten Non-abelian Gauge Theory". International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 58 (10): 3203–3224. doi:10.1007/s10773-019-04196-3. ISSN 1572-9575.
  15. ^ Cohen, L. (1966). "Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 7 (5): 781–786. Bibcode:1966JMP.....7..781C. doi:10.1063/1.1931206.
  16. ^ Agarwal, G. S.; Wolf, E. (1970). "Calculus for Functions of Noncommuting Operators and General Phase-Space Methods in Quantum Mechanics. II. Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space". Physical Review D. 2 (10): 2187–2205. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...2.2187A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2187.
  17. ^ Wigner, E. (1932). "On the Quantum Correction for Thermodynamic Equilibrium". Physical Review. 40 (5): 749–759. Bibcode:1932PhRv...40..749W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.40.749. hdl:10338.dmlcz/141466.
  18. ^ Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1963). "Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams". Physical Review Letters. 10 (7): 277–279. Bibcode:1963PhRvL..10..277S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277.
  19. ^ Glauber, Roy J. (1963). "Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field". Physical Review. 131 (6): 2766–2788. Bibcode:1963PhRv..131.2766G. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766.
  20. ^ Kôdi Husimi (1940). "Some Formal Properties of the Density Matrix", Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22: 264–314.
  21. ^ Moyal, J. E.; Bartlett, M. S. (1949). "Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 45 (1): 99–124. Bibcode:1949PCPS...45...99M. doi:10.1017/S0305004100000487.
  22. ^ Lax, Melvin (1968). "Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes". Physical Review. 172 (2): 350–361. Bibcode:1968PhRv..172..350L. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.172.350.
  23. ^ Groenewold, H.J. (1946). "On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics". Physica. 12 (7): 405–460. Bibcode:1946Phy....12..405G. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(46)80059-4.
  24. ^ Baker, George A. (1958). "Formulation of Quantum Mechanics Based on the Quasi-Probability Distribution Induced on Phase Space". Physical Review. 109 (6): 2198–2206. Bibcode:1958PhRv..109.2198B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.2198.
  25. ^ a b Costa, Caroline; Tenser, Marcia R.; Amorim, Ronni G. G.; Fernandes, Marco C. B.; Santana, Ademir E.; Vianna, J. David M. (2018-02-26). "Symplectic Field Theories: Scalar and Spinor Representations". Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras. 28 (1): 27. doi:10.1007/s00006-018-0840-4. ISSN 1661-4909.
  26. ^ Mo/ller, Klaus B.; Jo/rgensen, Thomas G.; Torres-Vega, Gabino (1997-05-01). "On coherent-state representations of quantum mechanics: Wave mechanics in phase space". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 106 (17): 7228–7240. doi:10.1063/1.473684. ISSN 0021-9606.