Talk:Comparison of reference management software/Archives/2017
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Comparison of reference management software. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On Word processor integration
I want to propose two changes in the structure of the comparison of word processor integration:
(1) Currently, Word and Word for Mac are listed as separated entries. I propose to combine these two entries, as there is no program that runs on Windows and macOS, but supports Word on Windows only. Additionally, support for other word processors are not split per operation system making the split for Word not only unneeded, but also inconsistent.
(2) Currently, even word processors a reference manager cannot support because it does not run on the same OS (e.g. citavi is Windows only, meaning it cannot support Apple's Pages that only runs on macOS) the support is listed as no. While this is correct, I think labeling such cases as 'n/a' more clearly communicates that such a support is impossible. Schlappwiki (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)