Jump to content

Help talk:Introduction to policies and guidelines/1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ezekielogboru (talk | contribs) at 04:09, 9 July 2020 (When you have registered with LifeTRNDS, you will receive a FREE €99 white education package voucher in your back office. You will have exactly 100 hours to use the education package before it disappears. (I en ruta) All new members joining through a regular signup or by a FREE white education package signup from July 4-10 will be a part of and can use the Golden Ticket Promotion - Just Pay It Forward if they register within 48 hours after receiving the special registration email. After reg...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Join Crowdi to Get Educated

https://crowd1.com/invitelink/?code=ZTBPdmJ1ODZPa09ralBhcXgyWEZLOE82ME5Sb1ozbzNIbXhnV2FoZWl6MXJTUmN0STFYK0VLMktvaFV0bFZhdw==

Icons

The display of this page (content section) on IE8 is overlapping the icons on the left and the text that follows them, so some of the text is covered by the icons. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 05:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC) make sure to love me — Preceding unsigned comment added by X x x baby x x x (talkcontribs) 05:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

I've formatted this using the {{intro to}} template to keep formatting consistent and centrally controlled with the other Help:introduction to pages. I've a few suggestions for other updates and improvements:

  • Conduct is a bit wordy. Maybe there's a way to cut down wordcount by 20%?
  • Are the nutshells necessary for such short paves? Could they just be lead sentences?
  • Somehow "policies and guidelines" feels really dry and may reduce readers. Perhaps there are other main titles that are less intimidating like "Principles" or even "content and conduct" or something?

What do other people think? T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 11:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV is not necessairly objective

Neutral point-of-view (or NPOV) means content is written objectively and without bias, merely presenting the facts and notable viewpoints of others.

WP:NPOV page avoids any use of the word objective. Actually, the only use is to respond to the misunderstanding where NPOV might be thought of as a state of objectivity.

Let's find a better way to present such an important part of future Wikipedians orientation to WP. Calexit (talk) 23:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing username

Nice to be here and I believe l will be meeting some other members of the community for a nice time of sharing different ideas and experiences. Chekwubeokeke (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My username is chekwubeokeke but I will to change my username to Chineduokeke I don’t know if it is possible? Chekwubeokeke (talk) 17:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chekwubeokeke: it's unfortunately not that easy. You're looking for Wikipedia:Changing username, but you need to read the instructions carefully. Sdkb (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]