This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Michaeldorner(talk | contribs) at 18:18, 30 June 2020(Michaeldorner moved page Talk:InnerSource to Talk:Inner Source: It is "inner source", not "InnerSource" as all scientific literature follows this naming convention. It is "open source" and not "OpenSource", too). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 18:18, 30 June 2020 by Michaeldorner(talk | contribs)(Michaeldorner moved page Talk:InnerSource to Talk:Inner Source: It is "inner source", not "InnerSource" as all scientific literature follows this naming convention. It is "open source" and not "OpenSource", too)
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
I do not think it makes sense to merge these two articles. There are big differences between open source and inner source development, e.g. accessibility (open source is/should be open for everyone, but inner source is restricted to the boundaries of a company), licensing, taxation, etc. The challenges are also different.
