Jump to content

Talk:PowerLinux

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jimj wpg (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 9 June 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
WikiProject iconLinux Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

All of Power Architecture

This article is heavily geared towards Linux on IBM POWER systems, but there are some references to other related architecture such as the PowerPC based JS20/JS21 blades and Cell systems such as QS20 and PS3. Shouldn't this whole article be expanded to include information on Linux runing on all Power Architecture based devices, such as computers by Apple, the Killer NIC, Genesi's OWD, OSW, Pegasos and Efika, a multitude of devices running Linux powered by Freescales Power Architecture processors? -- Henriok 14:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes (3 years isn't too long to wait for a reply is it?) --Faradayplank (talk) 15:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Officialy supported distributions

I removed references on statements that SLES and RHEL are Officialy supported distributions for IBM System p and i and asked for new ones. The question isn't about whether Red Hat and Novell are certified partners of IBM, but whether IBM supports SLES and RHEL on p and i.--Chealer 19:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Power on Linux is Wintel

"It is similar to Wintel, the combination of Microsoft Windows running on Intel x86 architecture." - I can't see the relevance of this statement. "Power on Linux" is more of an obvious statement(it's not even a compound word), while "wintel" is a syllabic abbreviation. On the technology side there isn't relevant parallels. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.159.252.133 (talk) 07:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Removing. -- Henriok (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page was" Linux on Power"

it's insane to remove any reference to community distributions that suppurts Power Architecture based machines included POWER processors ones. Shame on You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.77.205.123 (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I don't know how to reverse it though :( -- Henriok (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on PowerLinux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]