Jump to content

User talk:I'm not perfect but I'm almost

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by I'm not perfect but I'm almost (talk | contribs) at 03:39, 8 June 2020 (→Invitation to RedWarn). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, I'm not perfect but I'm almost, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2016 United States presidential election in Connecticut. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 13:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas

Nice to meet you ~
~ Damn ~ and I was just getting used to all that red ~ Thanks for your edit ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 20:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting vandalism warnings

Hi there! I've been patrolling for vandalism today, and it appears you're doing the same. I have noticed that on the talk pages of some offenders, you have been deleting my warnings and replacing them with your own. Unless the comment is vandalism, it is a violation of the policies outlined in WP:TPV to delete or edit someone else's talk page comments. Please refrain from deleting my warnings or those of anyone else. Instead, please add your comments in addition to those already there. Thanks! TheMrP (talk) 23:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheMrP: I did it because they were the same warning level; my bad, I apologize. As my username says, I'm not perfect but I'm almost (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi I'm not perfect but I'm almost. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Roem: This message is why ImNPBImA's username is so beautiful. I hope they keep up the great anti-vandalism work! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need vandalism help

Hello, I came across an article about the Chief minister of West Bengal(Mamata Banerjee) and was curious as to why there was no infobox. If you look at history, I added the infobox. I then saw this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mamata_Banerjee&diff=prev&oldid=928506877 and realized why there was no infobox. I also saw the same vandalism from the same user on Mukul Roy. I do not have roll back rights, so I would like a reply. Thoughts?Manabimasu (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Someone else took care of it.Manabimasu (talk) 13:47, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

~Swarm~ {sting} 02:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm: Sorry for the delay! I had to take a bit of a break. Thanks for granting me the rights! I'm not perfect but I'm almost (talk) 04:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to RedWarn

Hello, I'm not perfect but I'm almost! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

  • Easy to use - Unlike other tools, RedWarn uses easy to interpret icons and simple summaries for common actions, reducing both learning and reading times.
  • Supports rollback and rollback-like functionality - Unlike Twinkle, RedWarn supports both rollback and rollback-like functionality for users will rollback permissions. This decreases waiting times during rollbacks.
  • Making life easier on the battlefield - Ever been in the middle of a vandalism war or campaign, frantically reloading the history page to see a new edit? No more! Enabling RedWarn's "Alert on Change" feature will automatically send you to the latest edit when a new edit occurs - and if you're working on something else, RedWarn will send you a notification while the tab is still open in the background. No time wasted.
  • Rollback previews - If you're ever worried about the changes a rollback will make, especially in the case of reverting good faith edits, you can click the rollback preview button to preview the difference a rollback will make, with the version that will be restored on the right, and the latest revision on the left.
  • Always the latest revision - RedWarn will automatically redirect you to the latest revision if the rollback is no longer for the latest revision - no more frustrating errors.
  • Fast - RedWarn can automatically select a warning level, and, on vandalism and content removal rollbacks, automatically select a warning template.
  • Built on your feedback - RedWarn is receiving frequent feature additions and changes based on your feedback. If there's something you don't like, or would like to see, just say!
  • and many more features ...but I don't want to fill your userpage.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 35 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features which I haven't listed here. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 00:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I'll take a look later. I'm not perfect but I'm almost (talk) 03:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:I%27m_not_perfect_but_I%27m_almost&oldid=961377488"