NPOV : "If this article is about the objections to evolution, why is it constantly refuting those objections? Answering objections to evolution should be a different topic." Pat34lee (talk) 06:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The chores here are to help commonly seen issues. Help to see WP:NPOV is properly done - WP:IMPARTIAL tone, see that the objection is represented fairly and without editorial bias, not give undue weight to minor objections; not portray as equal validity, present fairly opinions about the objection in due proportion, etcetera. Markbassett (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Other : *Consider other objections as possible sections, such as "evolution presupposes..." arguments (currently discussed briefly under "Evolution is unfalsifiable"). Discuss possible alternative section schemes, particularly to remedy ambiguity in "Objections to evolution's plausibility" and "Objections to evolution's possibility" oversections.
