Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coder196/Archive
Coder196
Coder196 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
30 May 2020
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Chicago20092016 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
At 22:11 on 28 May I indeffed Coder196 for repeated copyright violations at Draft:Fengqi You, the only topic that I can see that he/she showed an interest in (some edits have been oversighted). Little more that 24 hours later, Chicago20092016 created an account and went straight to the same draft. This seems completely obvious, but my judgement has already been called into question once today, so I'd be grateful if someone else would look at it and do anything that's needed. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- No concerns with your judgement in this case Justlettersandnumbers.
Confirmed, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC) 
Clerk note: Ponyo, any particular reason the master isn't tagged? Reviewing the case before archiving and wanted to check whether that was intentional - if not, I'm happy to take care of it. creffett (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)- On a first case of socking I generally don't tag the master if there isn't evidence that they were aware that creating a new account constituted block evasion.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- For example, if Coder196 wasn't already blocked indefinitely for copyright violations, I likely would have only blocked them for a week or two for the WP:SOCK violation and not tagged them as a sockmaster unless they socked again, in which case WP:AGF goes out the window.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ponyo, and this is why I asked first! Thanks for the explanation, will archive. creffett (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
31 May 2020
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Asa1413 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ZhaoNing (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Only two edits, both to Draft:Fengqi You, created by Coder196 and later edited by sock Chicago20092016. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- This is ZhaoNing, and it is my main and only wikipedia account. I do not know who are the other users that edited Draft:Fengqi You. Currently, I have only edited this page, because Prof. Fengqi You is a well-known professor in the field of energy systems engineering, and I just learned that this page is under editing. In all, this is not a sockpuppet account. -- ZhaoNing 02:30, 01 June 2020 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- Same smaller city as before, just different ranges because of blocks and home/work connections. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Blocked and tagged. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
