Talk:Dupleix-class cruiser

Dupleix-class cruiser is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by Sturmvogel 66 (talk) at 02:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.

France C‑class Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dupleix-class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 08:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in good shape. A few comments:

Lead

suggest "The Dupleix-class consisted of three armoured cruisers"
suggest "the ships of the class were smaller and less powerfully armed" and move the link to sister ship to the the second para
"Desaix and Kléber exchanged assignments in 1907 ~~later~~"
Ottoman Empire is duplinked
"but in July she struck a naval mine laid by a German submarine and sank" (but the body says June?)

'Body

comma after "to the Navy Minister"
"the traditionalists ~~who~~ wanted cruisers"
suggest "modernists who ~~believed in~~sought armored cruisers"
link Armand Besnard
"and that itthe ships needed more endurance"
the displacement in the body and infobox don't match
I don't suppose you can link short tons?
conning tower armor in the infobox "9,100–120 mm"
intro 3rd DL before using the abbreviation

That's all I could find. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Syria is duplinked

Thanks for catching these. I don't really see a need for a link to short tons; links in the literature are only between metric and long tons.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, fair enough. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an acceptably licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]