Talk:Late Qing reforms

China: History Stub‑class High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as High-importance).

Thanks for the contribution of User:CWH to this article. Since the article now has more than 250 words and 1,500 characters in the main text (see Wikipedia:Stub), I have removed the stub template. --Evecurid (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Late Qing reforms

The main criterion at WP:CRITERIA is "how reliable English-language sources refer to the article's subject" JSTOR contains a representative listing of scholarly articles and chapters. A search for “Late Qing Reforms” got several thousand hits, though certainly not all of them significant, but for “New Policies” + “Qing” got none that were relevant. In fact, in spite of including “Qing” in the search, “New Policies” most frequently were to to Wang Anshi’s Song dynasty reforms.

"Recognizability," that is, "title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize," and "Naturalness." "New Policies" does not seem to be recognizable. It does not specify a country or time period.

So I will be bold and make the move.ch (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]