Talk:Windows Speech Recognition/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 13:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Opening sentence is too long, could use split.
" as handwritten tablet PC input" sea of blue and in any case, not sure we need a link for "handwriting".
Just a general thought, I normally expect no citations in the lead as everything mentioned there should be covered and preferably expanded upon in the main body, and that's where it can be cited.
You list a load of OSs in the lead, but I note that "Windows Server 2008 and later" is mentioned in the inbox and literally nowhere else.
A LOT of whitespace after the lead, consider constraining the Table of Contents to just level 2 & 3 headings.
Image captions which aren't complete sentences should not have a period.
"during development" the development.
"system -- a big" en-dash, not two hyphens.
"A prototype speech recognition Aero Wizard" this image is so small it's not really usable.
"An alternates panel disambiguation " why in italics?
There seems to be a variety of differing usage of italics...
"for speech synthesis,[58] to " overlinked.
What is the relevance of all those "See also" links other than the first one? They're all just other MS OS features, right?
Spaced hyphens in the ref titles should be en-dashes.
"Speech processing (−) (±)Speech processing software (−) (±)Speech recognition (−) (±)Speech recognition software (−) (±)" you problably only need the software categories as the others are generalisations of the software categories.

Ian Wolfman I'll give this until 15 May before failing it from a lack of response. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 11:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]