User talk:Pokai

Blanking talk page

It's not usual to completely blank your talk page, including the welcome message you were given. Old messages will not disappear completely (they will always be findable in the page history), but it means that other editors are likely to waste time giving advice you have already been given. Many editors set up an automatic archiving for their talk page, which moves old messages after a set time and keeps them tidily. It's pretty insulting to those who have written on your talk page that you consider all their helpful advice to be "trash". PamD 08:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CSD needs valid reason

"Lack of notability" is not a valid reason for CSD. Please read the criteria carefully and do not waste other people's time making incorrect nominations. I think you have already been advised about this, so I call this out as disruptive editing. If you continue to edit so carelessly you may find yourself blocked eventually. PamD 08:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you have been told already: see here. Please read and follow the advice you are given, rather than making more mistakes. Thanks. PamD 08:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Syed Gaji Shah, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not nominate for CSD unless the article fits one of the CSD criteria. Slow down and read the rules. PamD 08:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more sources?

In a short stub where every word of the content is sourced to an extremely reliable source, there is no need to add {{refimprove}}. Are you perhaps more interested in improving your own edit count? Please don't add tags unnecessarily. PamD 09:26, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand {{link rot}} would have been an appropriate tage to add, as the source is a bare URL, and it had a red-linked category (ie in this case wrongly guessed) which could usefully have been fixed. PamD 09:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

1."Sangsad Television"
Actual name is Sangsad Bangladesh Television (display show) and Sangsad Bangladesh (logo show). I donot no why you change.

2.Ananda TV
That channel have Bengali wiki page (https://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A6%86%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A6_%E0%A6%9F%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%AD%E0%A6%BF) but not in English.so i creating that.But you delete that. why?

3.Atn bangla have 'atn bangla uk' tv channel and it is a another channel, not same.

4.Tejgaon Circle Upazila is not a upazila. it is a circle. BD govt defunct that. now it is part of city corp.

SO why you change that? please undo that 4 topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md Moniruzzaman Emon (talk • contribs) 11:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All the editing are done under the policies of Wikipedia. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If any edit it improper then it will automatically revert by a bot or by an editor Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

comment: No 3. Its basically the same. I don't recommend to create a page for it, just add info into the main artcle. No 4. It's true. No comment/objection for other two. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomoskar

Nomoskar dada. Your userpage says your form Kolkata. If your are bengali, Please help Bangla Wikipedia. There are 30 koti Bengali but only very few (10-15) contibute in Bangla. Bengali is the 6th most spoken language but in wiki, we are 72th and only have 78 hajar article, while for example english wiki have 5.9 million. You can help by translating articles from english wikipedia to Bangla.

In mobile you can use Ridmik keyboard or Gboard to write Bangla. You don't have to learn anything, both key board have a option called avro. so, if you want to write for example আপনি কেমন আছেন?, you will need to type "aponi kemon achen?" and keyboard will convert that into Bengali text. Please help Bangla Wikipedia. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user, I am from Kolkata but since my childhood I don't use to live in Kolkata, I only lived in the outside states. I know a little bit of Bangla which I use for only spoken communication. Thank you so much. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Ok. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts don't go into categories

This was wrong. You can add [[:Category:American rappers]] with a colon to stop it operating on the draft, or put a category commented out, for info, but drafts shouldn't be appearing in category listings. PamD 11:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you so much for updating my knowledge. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 11:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangsad Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rampura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your great contribution, specially for Army Public School Dinjan. Bharat Ki Jai (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, this is a great Christmas gift for me.Pokai (talk) 08:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Žarko Rakčević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the link Pokai (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Priyanka Reddy Rape Case" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Priyanka Reddy Rape Case. Since you had some involvement with the Priyanka Reddy Rape Case redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from National Register of Citizens for Assam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the content should be removable, now it's your decision Pokai (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Please read MOS:OVERLINK and stop linking commonly-understood words like "American" as you did here. Thanks. PamD 23:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okk Pok aiᗙ Happy New Year! 03:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"More categories"?

What further categories do you think are needed here? He has birth and death, and two defining categories for what he is notable for. It might be possible to add a "People from xxx" category, but that really isn't necessary: if you think it's needed, you could add it yourself instead of tagging the article to suggest that someone else needs to do so. Please don't tag articles unnecessarily. PamD 12:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And also here: the article has just one category, but it's a very exact one and is the child category of everything else which might be appropriate. What other categories do you think it needs? There is no rule to say that just one category is not enough. Please don't add that tag unless you can think of other appropriate categories: if you can do so, please consider adding them yourself. Thanks. PamD 12:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Similar question regarding Roggwil-Berg railway station. It's categorized by owner (Südostbahn), geographic location (Thurgau), and structure type (railway station). What categories do you think are missing, given the available information in the article? Mackensen (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANd here. Please stop wasting everyone's time by adding irrelevant tags. PamD 17:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nature Park of India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nature Park of India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Blank

If an article is about a living person and has no sources, you should use the specific template{{Prod blp}} - always "subst"ing it, so you type: {{subst:Prod blp}}. Thanks. PamD 00:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Pok aiᗙ Happy New Year! 18:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No footnotes

When an article like Bahram al-Armani has plenty of sources but has just not specified any of them as references, it's better to use {{no footnotes}} rather than {{unreferenced}} as it makes clearer what the problem is. Thanks. PamD 00:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanveer Ashraf Bhatti (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tanveer Ashraf Bhatti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tanveer Ashraf Bhatti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeshwar Singh (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeshwar Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajeshwar Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]