Talk:Portable Distributed Objects

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Horribly biased article

This article seems to be horribly biased to me, and inaccurate as well:

It seems to be claiming that Objective C is a naturally superior language to anything else, and that because PDO was written in Objective C it is substantially better.
The claim that PDO was ignored because it didn't work with C++ and everyone ignored anything that didn't use C++ even if it was "better" is laughable
It seems to take every opportunity possible to take a swipe at MS's COM, OLE and DCOM technologies, which is described as having "limited functionality" (without source). It also seems to get the history of COM wrong; COM was not evolved from OLE, but written as a basis for a new implementation of OLE (OLE2).
The description of CORBA as being larger and requiring more code can probably be substantiated, but needs a source.

Also needs substantial cleanup work by somebody familiar with the subject. Text like "At the time PDO was [...]" with no indication of what time is being discussed. JulesH 18:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]