Talk:Zen of Python

Software: Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

meaning/explanation

Someone who is technical: Please add a less technical (more toward simpler English explanation) for each line. People newer to these things can learn a lot from this, but only if they know what it means. I personally was unable to find it translated to non-technical English 134.186.234.108 (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect "import this" to here?

Hi. I thought that perhaps if someone searches for import this, that it should redirect to this. Not sure how that's done. MinorFixes (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- Ok, I fig'ed it out. import this redirects to here. MinorFixes (talk) 03:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add numbers/ bullet points to the principles & Image size too big

1) I think the principles would be much easier to read, if they would have bullet points or numbering.

I added numbering, but it was reverted. Changing back and forth makes no sense, so I'd like to have a little dialogue. Reason for not using numbering was "They are not listed with numbers". If the list of principles is a quote, the article should say so. If it's not a quote the reasoning for not using numbers should be changed.

2) Change the image size might make the article more readable.

This is how the article looks on my screen:

               ______________________________________________
   Beautiful  |                                              |
   is         |                                              |
   better     |                                              |
   then       |                                              |
   ugly.      |                                              |
   Explicit   |                                              |
   is         |             Image                            |
   better     |                                              |
   than       |                                              |
   implicit.  |                                              |
   Simple     |                                              |
   is         |                                              |
   better     |                                              |
   than       |                                              |
   complex.   |                                              |

I changed it, but the change was reverted. For the same reason as above, I'd like to have a little dialogue on that. I'd like to note, that not everyone has a big screen or high DPI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BookRings (talk • contribs) 11:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not the original editor who reverted you, but I implemented the second change you suggested, as it's a good idea and the image just repeats the text to the left. As for the first suggestion, while we shouldn't slavishly reproduce facsimiles, we also shouldn't add new elements. Numbering might make people think it's a list of precepts, such that you could refer to them like "Zen #5". However, I wouldn't be opposed to a bulleted list being used. Let's see if anyone has any other input on that though. Opencooper (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer the content to resemble the original output, which does not have bullet points or numbers. Perhaps the image should go elsewhere altogether, let me take a look. +mt 03:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]