Talk:Miranda (programming language)

Computing: Software / CompSci C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

no source listed for the claim that Turner considers Miranda "dead,"

There's no source listed for the claim that Turner considers Miranda "dead," and that sentence was submitted anonymously (although apparently by someone who knows a lot about Turner). Can anyone cite a reference on this?

Beinsane 07:08, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Well, Miranda looks kind of dead to me. I was curious about it, and I tried to find the company which is supposed to be selling it, Reasearch Software, Ltd. And I can't. If a software company doesn't have a website in this day and age... --Ansible 04:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The company which owns Miranda (Research Software Limited) is still alive and filing tax returns in the UK. See https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/01714265/filing-history I note from the filings that Professor David Alan Turner is still listed as a Director and Shareholder of the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:440:8790:7C74:D6B0:D104:E901 (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quirk

> || The infinite list of all prime numbers, by the sieve of Eratosthenes.

Is there any reason why he drops out of the comment, only to immediately start a new one?--80.135.92.95 21:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That piece of code is using Miranda's literate script mode: every line _not starting_ with ">" is a comment. The confusing part is that the author starts the above comment with ">" (which would indicate it's actually code!), but then proceeds to write an "||", which indicates it's a comment after all. There, I answered your question after only 4 years! 201.231.81.53 (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Introduction

The lead begins "Miranda is a non-strict..." where "non-strict" forwards to the lazy evaluation page. This doesn't seem correct as there are many non-strict languages that aren't lazy. I haven't touched anything though as I'm not sure what the edit should be. --91.231.145.253 (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to Haskell

This article looks like an introduction to Haskell - the syntax is strikingly similar. Are there aspects and features of Miranda that are different and have not found their way into Haskell? --Cebus (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

query

Re "difference between the of the child nodes is not higher than 1 " should that be "difference between the child nodes is not higher than 1"? Ϣere SpielChequers 15:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]