Jump to content

Talk:Cartesian circle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oludara Orederu (talk | contribs) at 22:42, 10 March 2020 (Why "non-primary sources needed"?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Logic

Why "non-primary sources needed"?

I'm removing two instances of "non-primary source needed" that appear with direct quotations of Descarte's replies to the the Circle objection. In the primary source, Descartes is explicitly stating that he is responding to the objection. This does not appear to involve any original research and I think it should not require a secondary source.Nomadx (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to this article!