Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayton datlowe
Appearance
This biography does not appear to meet notability standards and a large section at the end of the article, Relations, is mainly not biographical. If not deleted, it should at least be cleaned up and moved to a properly capitalized name. Regards, Nick—Contact/Contribs 15:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Already moved to Dayton Datlowe without prejudice. B.Wind 21:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Aside from the obvious problems, this unreferenced article does not satisfy WP:N and does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) in my opinion. ccscott 17:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. It has no significance save to the person who wrote it. -- Kerowren 18:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Not enough information to establish notability. SteveHopson 21:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- The first two references establish WP:PROF directly (the third is an index to a journal that apparently has an article with Datlow as co-author); so he seems to merit a Wikipedia article if it is properly written. Unfortunately, this barely says anything at all besides the references. Close call: Stubify and keep. If the stub is unchanged in, say, three months, it should be deleted as WP:PROF establishes necessary, but not necessarily sufficient, conditions for keeping articles on faculty. B.Wind 21:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)