Jump to content

Unavoidable pattern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Largoplazo (talk | contribs) at 12:34, 26 February 2020 (Pattern). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics and theoretical computer science, a pattern is an unavoidable pattern if it's unavoidable on any finite alphabet.

Definitions

Pattern

Like a word, a pattern (also referred to as term) is a sequence of characters over some alphabet.

The minimum multiplicity of pattern is where is the number of occurrence of character in pattern . In other words, it is the number of occurrences in of the least frequently occurring character in .

Instance

A word  is an instance of pattern , if there exists a non-erasing semigroup morphism  such that . Non-erasing means .

Avoid / Match

A word matches(also reference as: encounters) pattern if there exists a factor of , which is also an instance of . Otherwise, avoids . If avoids , is also called -free.

Avoidability / Unavoidability on a specific alphabet

A pattern is unavoidable on a finite alphabet if there exists , word matches for all . Otherwise, is avoidable on , which implies there exist infinitely many words over alphabet that avoid . This is equivalent to saying that is avoidable on if there exists an infinite word that avoids .

Avoidable / Unavoidable pattern

A pattern is an unavoidable pattern(also reference as: blocking term) if is unavoidable on any finite alphabet.

If a pattern is said to be unavoidable and not limited to a specific alphabet, then it's unavoidable for any finite alphabet by default. Conversely, if a pattern is said to be avoidable and not limited to a specific alphabet, then it's avoidable on some finite alphabet by default.

-avoidable / -unavoidable

A pattern is -avoidable if is avoidable on an alphabet of size . Otherwise, is -unavoidable, which means is unavoidable on every alphabet of size .[1][2]

If pattern is -avoidable, then is -avoidable for all .

Avoidability index

The avoidability index of a pattern is the smallest such that is -avoidable, if is unavoidable.[3]

Properties

  • Let pattern be an instance of avoidable pattern , then is also avoidable.[4]
  • Let avoidable pattern be a factor of pattern , then is also avoidable.[4]
  • A pattern is unavoidable if and only if is a factor of some unavoidable pattern .
  • Given an unavoidable pattern and a character not in , then is unavoidable.[4]
  • Given an unavoidable pattern , there exist a character such that occurs excatly once in .[4]
  • Given a pattern , let represents the number of distinct characters of . if , then is avoidable.[4]

Zimin words

Given alphabet , Zimin words(patterns) are defined recursively  for and base case .

Unavoidability

All Zimin words are unavoidable.[5]

A word  is unavoidable if and only if it's a factor of a Zimin word.[5]


Given a finite alphabet , let represents the smallest such that matches for all . We have following properties:[6]

is the longest unavoidable patterns constructed by alphabet since

Pattern reduction

Free letter

Given a pattern  over some alphabet , we say  is free for  if there exist subsets  of  such that the following hold:

  1.  is a factor of  and  ↔   is a factor of  and

e.g. let , then  is free for  since there exist  satisfied conditions above.

Reduce

A pattern  can reduce to pattern  if there exists a character such that is free for , and  can be obtained by removing all occurrence of from . Denote as .

e.g. let , then can reduce to  since  is free for .

Transitivity

Given patterns , if  can reduce to  and  can reduce to , then  can reduce to . Denote as .

Unavoidability

A pattern  is unavoidable if and only if can reduce to a word of length one, hence where .[7][5]

Graph pattern avoidance[8]

Avoid / Match on a specific graph

Given a simple graph , a edge coloring matches pattern if there exists a simple path in such that the sequence matches . Otherwise, is said to avoid or -free.

Similarly, a vertex coloring matches pattern if there exists a simple path in such that the sequence matches .

Pattern chromatic number

The pattern chromatic number is the minimal number of distinct colors needed for a -free vertex coloring over the graph .

Let where is the set of all simple graphs with a maximum degree no more than .

Similarly, denote for edge coloring.

Avoidability / Unavoidability on graphs

A pattern is avoidable on graphs if is bounded by , where only depend on .

  • Avoidance on words can be expressed as a specific case of avoidance on graphs, hence a pattern is avoidable on any finite alphabet if and only if for all where is a graph of vertexs concatenated.


There exist an absolute constant , such that for all pattern with .

Given a pattern , let represents the number of distinct characters of . if , then is avoidable on graphs.

Given a pattern such that is even for all , then for all where is the complete graph of n vertices.

Examples

  • The Thue–Morse sequence is cube-free and overlap-free, hence it avoids the patterns and .[1][2]
  • The patterns and are unavoidable on any alphabet, since they are factors of the Zimin words.[9][10]
  • The power patterns for are 2-avoidable.[1]
  • A square-free word is one avoiding the pattern . An example is the word over the alphabet obtained by taking the first difference of the Thue–Morse sequence.[11][12] See also Square-free word.
  • All binary patterns can divided into three categories:[13]
    • are unavoidable.
    • have avoidability index of 3.
    • others have avoidability index of 2.
  • has avoidability index of 4, as well as other locked words.[14]
  • has avoidability index of 5.[15]

Open problems

  • Is there an avoidable pattern such that the avoidability index of is 6?

References

  1. ^ a b c Lothaire (2011) p. 113
  2. ^ a b Berstel et al (2009) p.127
  3. ^ Lothaire (2011) p.124
  4. ^ a b c d e Schmidt, Ursula (1987-08-01). "Long unavoidable patterns". Acta Informatica. 24 (4): 433–445. doi:10.1007/BF00292112. ISSN 1432-0525.
  5. ^ a b c Zimin, A. I. (1984). "BLOCKING SETS OF TERMS". Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik. 47 (2): 353. doi:10.1070/SM1984v047n02ABEH002647. ISSN 0025-5734.
  6. ^ Joshua, Cooper; Rorabaugh, Danny (2013). Bounds on Zimin Word Avoidance. arXiv:1409.3080. Bibcode:2014arXiv1409.3080C.
  7. ^ BEAN, DWIGHT RICHARD; EHRENFEUCHT, ANDRZEJ; MCNULTY, GEORGE FRANK (1979). Avoidable Patterns in Strings of Symbols (PDF).
  8. ^ Grytczuk, Jarosław (2007-05-28). "Pattern avoidance on graphs". Discrete Mathematics. The Fourth Caracow Conference on Graph Theory. 307 (11): 1341–1346. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2005.11.071. ISSN 0012-365X.
  9. ^ Allouche & Shallit (2003) p.24
  10. ^ Lothaire (2011) p.115
  11. ^ Pytheas Fogg (2002) p.104
  12. ^ Berstel et al (2009) p.97
  13. ^ Lothaire, M. (2002). Algebraic Combinatorics on Words.
  14. ^ Baker, Kirby A.; McNulty, George F.; Taylor, Walter (1989-12-18). "Growth problems for avoidable words". Theoretical Computer Science. 69 (3): 319–345. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(89)90071-6. ISSN 0304-3975.
  15. ^ Clark, Ronald J. (2006-04-01). "The existence of a pattern which is 5-avoidable but 4-unavoidable". International Journal of Algebra and Computation. 16 (02): 351–367. doi:10.1142/S0218196706002950. ISSN 0218-1967.