Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conceptual interoperability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Reyk (talk | contribs) at 06:06, 25 February 2020 (Creating deletion discussion page for Conceptual interoperability. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Conceptual interoperability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I gave this a fair bit of thought but, in the end, I don't think this is suitable as a Wikipedia article. It only very unclearly explains what the topic is even about. After reading it through several times I painfully and cautiously reached the conclusion that it's saying that systems designed to work on the same or similar kinds of data are better at it than systems not designed to work together. Then you can divide how good systems are at cooperation into arbitrary levels and give them fancy names, and this article apparently is mostly about the highest and best level.

All of this is not that interesting or useful a revelation, and it's bogged down in a swamp of pompo-verbosity. I suspect the author of the article, and of the conference proceedings it's based on, is deliberately disguising the content's banality with confusing fancy words. Just look at the ridiculous clipart "figure".

I think this should be deleted because the point of an encyclopedia article is to impart information to the reader. This article doesn't do that, and cannot ever do that because the sources it's based on are also buzzword laden nonsense. Reyk YO! 06:06, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]