Talk:Student Unity

The 'Decline of Student Unity' section was removed due to Wikipedia's prohibition on original research. - 58.160.190.44 14:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone aware of the results of NUS elections over the last two years cannot deny that the influence of Student Unity has declined. Perhaps you could point out what exactly (or even better, change it yourself), in that chapter is NPOV or factually inaccurate, without just chopping it all out or simply posting that box at the beginning of it. Ben Raue (Talk) 04:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, clearly it is more than premature to speak of the 'decline' of Student Unity. Certainly, the faction has much less influence than it did several years ago, but it is absurd to argue that the faction is in any way coming to an end and that is non-NPOV. - 192.43.227.18 02:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 3 year deal with Qld. The deal the Victorian side of Unity did with the NSW side was a 2 year deal- NSW supported Victoria in 2005 and Victoria supported NSW in 2006. It would seem Victoria honoured that deal.

I'm happy to remove any references to a "3-year deal". But my understanding was that Ryan Hamilton still challenged Michael de Bruyn in 2005, and Josh Rayner still challenged Camden Gilchrist in 2006. I'll make some changes, make some more if you want, without just blanking the whole section. Ben Raue (Talk) 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I refer Ben to the "Verifiability" policy:

  # Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources.
  # Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor.
  # The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.

Hence, the entire 'Decline of Student Unity' section has been removed pending the finding of reliable sources. - 192.43.227.18 02:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]