Talk:Truncated binary encoding
Appearance
Shouldn't the page either
- define n as the size of the alphabet (e.g. for 0 through 4, n = 5, not 4), or
- say that binary codes are optimal when n (as defined currently, the highest number) is one less than a power of two?
--Steve Witham 7 March 2005
Yes! Thanks for pointing this out. (Sorry about the delay... I wish wikipedia emailed me these things!) I chose the first option.
--Clausen 00:03, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)