Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of cryptography libraries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 62.2.246.66 (talk) at 16:56, 6 February 2020 (OpenSSL has no support for Blake2-MAC). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bouncy Castle validated and certified

I was trying to update this page to clarify that Bouncy Castle 1.0.0 (latest version is 1.0.1) has been validated to FIPS 140-2 and has been certified. I am not good enough with the markup used on wikipedia to fix this tho. Can someone help? Source: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/1401val2016.htm#2768 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omarkj (talkcontribs) 22:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section for Lightweight Block Ciphers

Lightweight Block Ciphers with ARX design have become increasingly popular. The ciphers have a lot of interest for resource constrained devices and Internet of Things. The ciphers include CHAM, LEA, Simon and Speck. It might be a good idea to add a new section for modern Lightweight Block Ciphers designs.

Addition of Tink?

I don't have time to add it now, but I think Tink should be included on this page: https://github.com/google/tink — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.209.193.6 (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OpenSSL has no support for Blake2-MAC

It is documented in the Master branch, but not in 1.1.1, and inspection of the change log (and the 1.1.1 source code) confirms this.

Thus it *will* be supported - but isn't yet. 16:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)